Advocate Subodh Bajpai practises at the Delhi High Court and across Delhi–NCR tribunals through Unified Chambers And Associates. The chambers focus on the legal terrain Indian businesses actually fight on — banking, recovery, insolvency, commercial disputes, and corporate advisory.
All services listed below are legal services. In compliance with Bar Council of India rules, the chambers do not provide capital arrangement, investment advisory, marketing services, or commercial intermediation — those activities are outside the scope of legal practice.
End-to-end representation under the SARFAESI Act 2002 — defending borrowers, contesting wrongful NPA classification, restructuring obligations, and securing relief at every stage from Section 13 notices to DRAT appeals.
Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings — original applications, securitisation appeals, interim orders, recovery certificates, and DRAT review petitions across Delhi and the wider Indian banking landscape.
Section 7, 9, and 10 petitions before the NCLT — corporate insolvency resolution process, resolution plans, liquidation matters, and personal-guarantor insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016.
Cheque dishonour matters under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act — pre-litigation notices, complaint cases, defences, settlement strategy, and appellate proceedings.
Contract enforcement, recovery suits, partnership and shareholder disputes, arbitration, and ongoing corporate-advisory retainerships for Indian enterprises and founders.
Verifiable Public Record
Each item above is a verifiable third-party record — publication archive, university degree register, statutory enrolment register, or international identifier authority. No comparative claims; factual disclosure consistent with BCI Rule 36.
Senior Partner Advocate Subodh Bajpai represents financial institutions in SARFAESI Section 13 enforcement, DRT and DRAT proceedings, NCLT IBC admissions, wilful-defaulter declarations, and Section 138 NI Act portfolios. Engagements are governed by written engagement letters, conflict-screened, and reported under structured cadences tailored to institutional MIS requirements.
Unified Chambers And Associates is a New Delhi–based law firm that practises at the Delhi High Court and across Delhi-NCR tribunals. The chambers focus on commercial-legal disputes Indian businesses actually face — banking and recovery matters, insolvency proceedings, Section 138 NI Act cases, and commercial litigation. All work is legal advisory and litigation; in compliance with Bar Council of India rules, the chambers do not provide commercial advisory, capital arrangement, investment advisory, or marketing services.
Indian commercial law operates across a layered statutory architecture, and effective representation requires fluency across multiple frameworks simultaneously. The principal statutes the chambers work with on a daily basis include the Indian Contract Act 1872 (foundational law on contractual obligations and remedies), the Companies Act 2013 (corporate governance, shareholder rights, oppression and mismanagement), the SARFAESI Act 2002 (secured-creditor enforcement), the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993 (DRT proceedings), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (corporate insolvency, personal-guarantor insolvency), the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 (Section 138 cheque-dishonour matters), the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (general civil-litigation procedure), the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (criminal procedure including Section 138 prosecutions), the Limitation Act 1963 (time-bar provisions), and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (arbitration framework).
Beyond these primary statutes, several specialised frameworks apply to specific dispute categories: the MSMED Act 2006 for MSME recovery rights, the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 for cross-border transactions, the IT Act 2000 for digital-content disputes, the DPDP Act 2023 for data-protection matters, the Specific Relief Act 1963 for non-monetary remedies, and the Indian Stamp Act 1899 for documentation enforceability questions.
The chambers practise across a multi-forum hierarchy. The Delhi High Court is Senior Partner Subodh Bajpai's primary court of practice. The Supreme Court of India is approached for matters that have exhausted High Court remedies or that raise substantial questions of constitutional importance.
Specialised tribunals handle specific categories of matters. The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Delhi has exclusive jurisdiction for bank recovery actions exceeding INR 20 lakh under the RDDB Act. The DRT also handles Section 17 securitisation appeals under SARFAESI. The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) hears appeals from DRT orders. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Principal Bench at Delhi handles all IBC proceedings — Section 7 financial-creditor admissions, Section 9 operational-creditor admissions, Section 10 voluntary insolvency, liquidation matters, and personal-guarantor proceedings. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) hears IBC appeals.
District Courts and Magistrate Courts handle civil suits, Section 138 NI Act criminal complaints, and Section 14 SARFAESI possession applications. Arbitration tribunals handle disputes governed by arbitration agreements. Each forum has its own procedural rules, filing requirements, and bench protocols, and effective representation requires specialist familiarity with each.
Every engagement begins with a confidential intake. The first step is to understand the matter — the underlying transaction, the documents that exist, the procedural history of any dispute, the client's commercial objective, and the timeline within which a resolution is required. This intake is substantive: it determines whether the chambers are positioned to take the matter, whether the legal merits justify engagement, and what the realistic outcomes are.
After intake, the chambers conduct a substantive merits assessment. This involves reviewing the documents in detail, evaluating the limitation position, identifying available substantive defences or grounds, and identifying the procedural path that best serves the client's commercial interest. A merits assessment is not a marketing pitch — it sometimes results in advice that the matter does not justify litigation, that the strongest move is to settle, or that the legal merits favour the opposite party.
Where the chambers take the matter, the engagement is documented through an engagement letter setting out scope, professional fees, anticipated disbursements, and communication protocols. Conflict checks are run against existing client engagements before any matter is accepted. Client confidentiality is a foundational professional obligation maintained throughout.
Bar Council of India professional rules require advocates to focus exclusively on legal practice. To comply with these rules, the chambers do not provide several categories of work that fall outside legal practice. These include: arrangement of capital or loans (this is commercial advisory work, not legal practice); investment advisory in the SEBI-regulated sense (investment advice in India requires separate SEBI registration); marketing services or PR campaigns (these are commercial services, not legal services); financial intermediation or brokerage; and any service that requires a professional registration the chambers do not hold.
What the chambers do provide is the legal layer — drafting, regulatory compliance opinions, dispute resolution, litigation, and corporate advisory grounded in legal questions. For commercial-advisory needs that fall outside legal practice, the chambers refer clients to independent qualified professionals.
Fee arrangements at the chambers are case-by-case. Litigation matters are typically structured on a hearing-fee basis with separate drafting and filing fees for pleadings. Corporate-advisory retainerships are structured monthly. Disbursements (court fees, stamp duty, document costs, expert engagement, travel) are billed separately.
Specific commercial fee arrangements that fall outside professional standards — for instance, contingency fees, success-based fees calibrated to recovery amounts, or commission arrangements — are not used. This aligns with Bar Council of India professional standards and reflects the chambers' approach to fee transparency.
The chambers cover six core practice areas: (1) Debt Recovery & SARFAESI proceedings; (2) Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and DRAT litigation; (3) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) matters before the NCLT; (4) Section 138 NI Act (cheque dishonour); (5) Commercial Litigation including contract enforcement, partnership disputes, and shareholder oppression; (6) Corporate Advisory retainer engagements.
No. Bar Council of India rules require advocates to focus solely on legal practice. The chambers provide legal advisory and litigation services on banking, lending, and recovery disputes — they do not arrange capital, intermediate loans, or facilitate transactions.
No. Investment advice in India requires registration as an Investment Adviser with SEBI, which the chambers do not hold (and which would be incompatible with legal practice under BCI rules). The chambers provide only legal counsel on the regulatory and contractual aspects of investments.
The chambers practise at the Delhi High Court (primary), the Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi, the National Company Law Tribunal Delhi, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, district courts across Delhi-NCR, and the Supreme Court of India for matters requiring escalation.
Fees are case-by-case. Litigation matters are structured on a hearing-fee basis with separate drafting and filing fees for pleadings. Corporate-advisory retainerships are structured monthly. Specific commercial arrangements that fall outside professional standards (contingency fees, success-based fees) are not used.
Email subodhbajpai.22@gmail.com or use the contact form on subodhbajpai.in/contact with a brief outline of the matter. Initial assessments are typically returned within 48 hours. After the intake call, a substantive merits assessment is conducted, and if the chambers take the matter, an engagement letter is issued setting out scope and fees.
The chambers accept new instructions across debt recovery, SARFAESI, DRT, IBC, Section 138, and commercial litigation. Initial assessments are typically returned within 48 hours.
Contact Chambers →